Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Cone-beam CT¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¾È¸éºñ´ëĪÀÚ¿¡¼­ À̺ÎÆíÀ§¿¡ µû¸¥ Ä¡¼ºº¸»óÀÇ ¾ç»óºÐ¼®

Correlation between menton deviation and dental compensation in facial asymmetry using cone-beam CT

Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2009³â 39±Ç 5È£ p.300 ~ 309
¹Ú¼öº´, ¹ÚÁ¤Èñ, Á¤¿¬È­, Á¶ºÀÇý, ±è¿ëÀÏ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹Ú¼öº´ ( Park Soo-Byung ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç
¹ÚÁ¤Èñ ( Park Jeong-Heuy ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç
Á¤¿¬È­ ( Jung Yun-Hoa ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç
Á¶ºÀÇý ( Cho Bong-Hae ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç
±è¿ëÀÏ ( Kim Yong-Il ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸´Â Cone-beam CTÀÇ MPRÀ̹ÌÁö»ó¿¡¼­ ÇϾǰñ Æò¸é¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇÏ¾Ç Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡¿Í °ßÄ¡ÀÇ ÆíÀ§Ãø°ú ºñÆíÀ§ÃøÀÇ ³ôÀÌ¿Í °¢µµÂ÷ÀÌ ±×¸®°í FH Æò¸é¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ó¾Ç Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡¿Í °ßÄ¡ÀÇ ÆíÀ§Ãø°ú ºñÆíÀ§ÃøÀÇ ³ôÀÌ¿Í °¢µµÂ÷À̸¦ °èÃøÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ¾È¸éºñ´ëĪÀÚ¿¡¼­ À̺ÎÆíÀ§¿¡ µû¸¥ ÆíÀ§Ãø°ú ºñÆíÀ§ÃøÀÇ Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡¿Í °ßÄ¡ÀÇ ³ôÀÌ¿Í Çù¼³Ãø °æ»çµµ¸¦ CBCT¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°í ±× °ü·Ã¼ºÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸´Â µ¥ ÀÖ´Ù. ¿¬±¸´ë»óÀº ÇϾǰñÀÇ À̺ÎÆíÀ§¸¦ µ¿¹ÝÇÑ ¾È¸éºñ´ëĪ ȯÀÚ 50¸í(¿©ÀÚ 29¸í, ³²ÀÚ 21¸í, Æò±Õ³ªÀÌ 24¼¼ 4°³¿ù)À¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ëÁ¶±ºÀ¸·Î Æò±Õ³ªÀÌ 25¼¼ 7°³¿ùÀÎ 20¸í(³²ÀÚ 11¸í, ¿©ÀÚ 9¸í)À» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °á°ú´Â À̺ÎÆíÀ§¿¡ ´ëÇØ FH Æò¸é¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ó¾Ç Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡ÀÇ ÆíÀ§Ãø°ú ºñÆíÀ§ÃøÀÇ ±æÀÌ ¹× °¢µµ Â÷ÀÌ(ÆíÀ§Ãø - ºñÆíÀ§Ãø)´Â ´ëÁ¶±º¿¡ ´ëÇØ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏ¿´´Ù (p £¼ 0.01). ºñ´ëĪ±º¿¡¼­ »ó¾Ç Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡ °¢µµ´Â ÆíÀ§ÃøÀÌ ºñÆíÀ§Ãøº¸´Ù Æò±Õ 8.62 ¡¾ 5.95o ÄÇ´Ù (p £¼ 0.01). »ó¾Ç °ßÄ¡ÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡µµ ÆíÀ§Ãø°ú ºñÆíÀ§ÃøÀÇ °¢µµÂ÷ÀÌ°¡ Æò±Õ 4.48 ¡¾ 5.05o·Î Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏ¿´´Ù (p £¼ 0.01). ÇϾǰñ Æò¸é¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇÏ¾Ç Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡ÀÇ ¼öÁ÷ ±æÀÌ¿Í °¢µµ´Â ÆíÀ§Ãø°ú ºñÆíÀ§Ãø¿¡¼­ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏ¿´´Ù (p £¼ 0.01). °¢µµÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ´Â Æò±Õ ?11.92 ¡¾ 5.79o·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. À̺ÎÆíÀ§¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »óÇÏ¾Ç Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡¿Í °ßÄ¡ÀÇ ¼öÁ÷°Å¸® ¹× °¢µµÀÇ Pearson »ó°üºÐ¼® ¹× ȸ±ÍºÐ¼® °á°ú, FH Æò¸é¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »ó¾Ç Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡ÀÇ ÆíÀ§Ãø°ú ºñÆíÀ§ÃøÀÇ °¢µµÂ÷ÀÌ(?¡ÐUM6-FH plane (dev.-ndev.))´Â Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ ¾çÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú°í, ÇϾǰñ Æò¸é¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇÏ¾Ç Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡ÀÇ ÆíÀ§Ãø°ú ºñÆíÀ§ÃøÀÇ °¢µµÂ÷ÀÌ(?¡ÐLM6-Mn plane (dev.-ndev.))´Â Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ À½ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú¿¡¼­ À̺ÎÆíÀ§¸¦ µ¿¹ÝÇÑ ÇϾǰñ ºñ´ëĪÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì, À̺ΰ¡ ÆíÀ§µÇ´Â ¹æÇâÀ¸·Î »óÇÏ¾Ç Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡ÀÇ Ä¡¾ÆÀåÃàÀÇ °¢µµ°¡ º¯È­µÇ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between menton deviation and dental compensation in facial asymmetry.

Methods: Tooth axis and distance of first molar and canine to the reference plane were investigated by cone-beam computerized tomography. The subjects consisted of 50 patients with asymmetric mandibles (male 21, female 29, mean age 24.3 years). Control groups were also assessed (male 11, female 9, mean age 25.6 years). Nine measurements (5 linear measurements and 4 angular measurements) were measured in order to evaluate the correlation between menton deviation and the linear and angular difference of first molar and canine in the deviated and none-deviated sides using the defined MPR images. The differences between deviated and non-deviated side, according to menton deviation, were statistically analyzed using stepwise multiple regression analysis.

Results: From the result, Menton deviation was negatively correlated with mandibular first molar¡¯s angular measurement (?¡ÐLM6-Mn plane (dev.-ndev.)) and positively with maxillary fist molar¡¯s angular measurement (?¡ÐUM6-FH plane (dev.-ndev.)) (p £¼ 0.01). Two angular measurements (?¡ÐLM6-Mn plane (dev.-ndev.), ?¡ÐUM6-FH plane (dev.-ndev.)) explained the variability in menton deviation with a significant r2 value of 0.589.

Conclusions: This study suggests that the tooth axis of upper and lower first molars leans towards the deviated side of Menton when there is mandibular asymmetry with Menton deviation.

Å°¿öµå

Äܺö CT;¼úÀü ±³Á¤;±³ÇÕÆò¸é;À̺ÎÆíÀ§;¾È¸éºñ´ëĪ
Cone-beam computed tomography;Presurgical orthodontics;Occlusal plane;Menton deviation;Facial asymmetry

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed